PART FIRST
THE BIRTHRIGHT; OR, THE PROMISE OF MANY NATIONS TO ABRAHAM
"Behold,
my covenant is with thee, and thou shalt be a father of many nations.
Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham;
for a father of many nations have I made thee. And I will make thee exceeding
fruitful, and I will make nations of thee, and kings shall come out of
thee."
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTORY
Although it is not generally known, it is nevertheless true
that God made two covenants with Abraham, or, rather, that he made one with
Abram and another with that same man after his name was changed to
Abraham. This change of name was made
that it might harmonize with the new character and the new order of things as
they pertain to the covenant man.
The first, or Abram, covenant was made when the man was
ninety years old; but the second, or Abraham, covenant was not made until this
man was called upon to make the one great sacrifice of his life.
The text of
the first of these covenants is as follows: "And when Abram was ninety
years old and nine, the Lord appeared to Abram, and said unto him, I am the
Almighty God; walk before me and be thou perfect. And I will make my covenant
between me and thee, and will multiply thee exceedingly. And Abram fell on his face; and God talked
with him, Saying: As for me, behold my covenant is with thee, and thou shalt be
a father of many nations. Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but
thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee. And I
will make thee exceeding fruitful, and I will make nations of thee, and kings
shall come out of thee. And I will establish my covenant between me and thee
and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be
a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee.
And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein
thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and
I will be their God," Gen. 17:1-8.
We see at once
that the great feature of this covenant is a multiplicity of seed for a man
that hitherto has been childless; and that this multitude of people are to
become, not one great nation, not simply a plurality of nations, but a large
plurality, i.e., "MANY
NATIONS."
With the great
majority of Bible students, and with most schools of Biblical thought, the fact
that the Lord, when making this covenant, promised Abram that he should become the father of more than one nation is
entirely overlooked. The general trend of the teaching is, that, of all the
people who dwell upon the face of the earth, the Jewish people are
distinctively the people, the one nation only, which is composed of the seed of
Abraham; and that they, and they alone, are the chosen people of God whose
national story makes up the great bulk of Biblical history and prophecy. But such cannot be the case, for if God has
fulfilled the first promise which he made to the father of the Jewish people,
he has made it possible for the people of some of the other nations of earth to
stand side by side with that one, and with them to say "We have Abraham to our father."
One special, and important, feature of
this covenant is, that among this multitude of Abrahamic seed there is to be a
royal, or kingly line; the posterity of which shall become the rulers of, at
least, some of these nations which shall owe their origin to one common
father. For the Lord not only promised Abraham that kings should come out of
his loins, but when he reiterated the promises of his covenant to Sarai, the
barren wife of Abraham, he said: "She shall be the mother of nations;
kings of people [R. V., nations] shall be of her." And so her name was
changed to Sarah, i.e., Princess, that she, too, might have a name which would
be in harmony with her new character, for only a princess may be the mother of
kings.
Another
special feature of this covenant is, that there is a land consideration, which
involves the land of Canaan in an everlasting bond -- not only of ownership,
but of possession. Evidently the everlasting possession of that land by its
lawful heirs has not yet begun, for, at this writing, it is in the hands of the
"Unspeakable Turk."
One other feature of this covenant is, that it is wholly
unconditional. That is, the Lord has promised, irrespective of the moral or
spiritual character of the people themselves, so to increase the posterity of
the Abrahamic lineage, that, nationally, they shall become all that the
covenant promises.
Centuries
after the giving of this covenant, when the Abrahamic posterity were quite
numerous, and while they were still together in one nation, the Lord made a
covenant with them which was conditional; but they broke faith with him, and
violated its specified conditions.
Since it is true, that, in contracting or conditional covenants, there
is both a party of the first and a party of the second part, and the law is,
that, when either party breaks the conditions, the other is not held, or bound
by them, hence when the covenant people broke their part of the contract, God was
no longer bound, and said: "They continued not in my covenant, and I
regarded them not." Thus that covenant was annulled. But in this covenant which we have under
consideration, God has assumed all responsibility, and to his integrity alone
must we look for its fulfillment. For while it is true that both God and
Abraham are parties to this covenant, we well know who has pledged himself,
and whose will it expresses, and whom to expect shall keep his word inviolate,
and which will be to blame if this covenant goes by default.
The second
covenant which God made with Abraham was not made until many years after the
first, and was made at a time when Abraham had just offered his only son, who
was the first of the promised many, as a sacrifice, in obedience to the command
of him who produced that son, by his creative power, from that which was as
good as dead, and as an expression of faith in the resurrective power of that
same covenant-making God. It is recorded as follows: "And the angel of the
Lord called unto Abraham the second time, and said, By myself have I sworn,
saith the Lord, for because thou hast done this thing, and hast not withheld
thy son, thine only son: that in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying
I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is
upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies; and in
thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast
obeyed my voice," Gen. 22:16-18.
Before
noticing the one great feature of this covenant, we wish to call your
attention to some of the minor points; the first of which is, that it also is
unconditional, "By myself have I sworn," is the declaration of the
covenant maker; hence this covenant can neither be broken nor annulled,
because, as in the first, God alone is the responsible party.
Another point
is, that there is a repetition and confirmation of the multiplicity of
children phase of the first covenant, to which is added the first detail as to
what shall be a national characteristic of Isaac's multiplied seed in their
relation to other nations, namely: "Thy seed shall possess the gate of his
enemies."
The Lord
usually gives himself two witnesses, or doubles his promises and prophecies, as
in the case of Pharaoh when he had dreamed the same thing twice and Joseph told
him the reason that the dream was doubled to him was because the thing which it
signified was of God. So it was with this gate blessing. It was at a time,
that, after consenting to accompany Abraham's servant and become the wife of
Isaac, through whom must come this great multitude of people, this gate
promise, together with that which pertains to the multiplicity of children,
was given to Rebekah. It came as a parting blessing from her brothers, who,
it seems, were imbued with the spirit of prophecy; for it is recorded that they
blessed her, and said: "Thou art
our sister, be thou the mother of thousands of millions, and let thy seed
possess the gate of those that hate them."
But the one
great special feature of this second covenant which God made with that one
man, is most certainly couched in the following words: "In thy seed shall
all the nations of the earth be blessed."
It will take but little investigation to reveal the fact that this one
phase of this last covenant is Messianic, and that it pertains especially to
but one person. But, that the many to
whom pertains the first covenant are involved in this, together with the one to
whom it more especially pertains, and that the principal one of this covenant
is involved, in the common bond of brotherhood, with the many of that first
covenant, no one will deny.
We
understand that at the time these words were uttered, it would have been
impossible to give them the fullness of meaning which the Holy Spirit has given
them, as interpreted in the New Testament, for it was under the illumination
given to the Apostle Paul, that their full import bursts upon us. It was when contrasting the law covenant --
the one which was annulled -- with this only-son covenant that Paul is careful
to say: "Now to Abraham were the promises made, even for his seed, He does
not say, and to the seeds," as
concerning many, but as concerning one: "and to thy seed which is
Christ."
We have here given the best translation,
for clearness, that the text will allow. In it the Apostle makes no attempt to
give an exact Old Testament quotation, but bases his argument on the strength
of the subject noun being in the singular number. The subject with which he is
dealing is the blessing that shall come upon all the Gentile nations through
Abraham's sacrificed son, the one seed, who
also was the Only Son of his Divine Father, just as Isaac, the type, was the
only son of his father when he was offered in sacrifice.
It
is not only the words, but also the circumstances connected with the giving of
these promises, which are prophetic. God had said to Abraham that the many nations
which he had formerly promised him should come through Isaac, his only son, but
afterward called upon him to sacrifice that son, who was the only one through
whom that promise could be fulfilled.
But Abraham knew that God had accomplished that which was equal to a
creation, when, through him and Sarah, who were both as good as dead, Isaac had
been produced; so, being strong in faith, he offered him up, "accounting
that God was able to raise him up, even from the dead; from whence also he
received him in a figure."
Could
any analogy be more complete?
A Son of
Promise, an only son, from whom so much is expected, sacrificed and accounted
dead, then, in symbol, raised from the dead! And the two special reasons for
this test, being, on the one hand, an encouragement to faith, and on the
other, that the son might live to fulfill his God-ordered destiny. The prototype of this is another Son of
Promise, an only Son, from whom so much -- so very much -- is promised and expected,
sacrificed on the tree, dead. But that the two witnesses, the word and the
symbol, of the promiser might not fail, the Divine Father, who gave back that
other only son, raises from the dead his only Son, that he also might become
the author and finisher of our faith, that he, too, might live and become all
that was promised and expected of him, and thus fulfill his glorious destiny.
We can ask no more, for both the lesser and the greater son, the type and
prototype, are, "as concerning the flesh," sons of Abraham.
Throughout
the world it is most generally known, and throughout Christendom it is
universally known, that "the seed to whom the promise was made," did
come; but it is not universally known, nor acknowledged throughout
Christendom, that the many peoples are included in that same covenant with this
one seed, without whom the entire
structure of Christianity must fall, and that every argument for the Christ,
from the covenant standpoint, must stand the crucial test of a numerous
posterity from the loins of Abraham, or go down. And yet it is so.
True,
the covenant with the people failed; true, the people sinned, and violated
their obligations; true, the law was added, because of their transgressions, to
bridge over, "till the [one] seed should come to whom the promise was
made." But the argument in favor of the Messianic covenant against all
this is, that "the covenant which was confirmed before of God in Christ,
the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that
it should make the promise of none effect."
How
could it? We, sirs, believe that it could not. All Christendom believes that it
could not. And if it could not, neither can the promise concerning a multiplicity
of children for Abraham be annulled.
For, with this same Messianic promise,
there is a repetition of the metaphor of many seeds, as the stars of heaven and
as the sands of the sea shore, together with the gate blessing; so we can just
as reasonably expect that Christ could or would have failed, as to expect that
the gate, the sand, and the star, promises shall have gone by default. But, at this late day in the history of the
world, with the Divine light of prophecy shining upon well known facts, which
once were only the subjects of prophetic utterances but are now the recorded
facts of authentic history, we can say with a confidence, which is supported by
the eternal Spirit, that neither have failed.
Elsewhere,
when this same Apostle was making an effort to encourage the faith of believers
in the faithfulness of God, he gives a word for word quotation from this same
covenant promise, saying: "When God made promise to Abraham, because he
could swear by no greater, he swore by himself, saying, Surely blessing I will bless thee, and multiplying l will multiply thee." This
quotation, as you see, pertains to the multiplicity of seed, and not to the
Messianic phase of the second covenant; but it proves to us that each
individual feature of that covenant stands on the same secure foundation, and
is just as sure of fulfillment as the other, for underneath every promise of
that covenant there are two immutable things -- God and his oath.
So,
we are safe in saying that God has made two unconditional covenants with
Abraham, and that, if he has been true to those covenants, then there are
"many nations" in existence on this earth today, the people of which
must have descended from Abraham and Sarah; and that these nations are in
possession of the gates, or entrances, of their national enemies; unless it be
that the time has not yet come for those promises to materialize.
The
facts, in either case, are revealed, and, as we proceed, we shall see which of
these is true; but thus far it is evident that one of these covenants is Messianic; that the other is multitudinous; that
each is contained in the other; that in them there is no contracting party of
the second part; and that both alike do stand on the integrity of God.
These
are the days of skeptical indifferentism on the one hand, and of rampant
infidelity on the other; of narrow sectarianism, worldly churchianity, and the
blatant headiness of higher (?)
criticism -- days when “Endor-ism” is called "Spiritual-ism," when Buddhism is sanctified by
the name of Theo-sophia, i.e., Divine wisdom, and when pure faith and true
spirituality are dubbed "Fanaticism."
Then
surely, in such days as these, all who believe that the promises of God are
never broken will be helped and encouraged when proof, full and abundant, shall
be given that not only the promise concerning the many nations, but all the
predictions of "Moses and the prophets," as they pertain either to
the Christ or to the many-nationed people, have been, are being -- on the
strength of that which has been, and that which now is -- shall yet be
fulfilled.